Skip to main content
Michigan’s nonpartisan, nonprofit news source

We need your vote!

During this important election year, Bridge readers like you know that high-quality journalism like ours is more critical than ever. There’s a lot on the line, and we’re working daily to deliver the information you need to prepare you for November’s election. Can we count on your vote of confidence in our newsroom? Donate today!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate

State takes cautious approach to freight hub proposals

A dizzying number of transportation-related proposals centered on Detroit's mid-continent location are floating around Michigan. They have funny names (Aerotropolis), links to faraway locales (Halifax, Nova Scotia) and impressive engineering goals (a rail tunnel tall enough to handle double-decker cars). One common thread through most of these proposals is a need for investment. The ideas are outracing the dollars.

Michael Belzer, a Wayne State University economist leading a concept to link Detroit with Halifax by rail, said last December that a hurdle to a Michigan opportunity was the "reluctance" of the Michigan Economic Development Corp. to provide the money necessary to start the work.

With little in the way of progress detected in recent months, Bridge asked MEDC's director of policy, Peter Anastor, to give its views on the various "multimodal" proposals around Detroit.

Bridge: What is MEDC's official position on the following proposals: The Great Lakes Global Freight Gateway; Aerotropolis; Continental Rail Gateway?

A: Michigan is working to leverage and promote all our significant assets in order to become a global transportation, distribution and logistics gateway. To accomplish this, we will need to prioritize the opportunities and identify barriers associated with various types of infrastructure and (Transportation, Distribution and Logistics) projects. Any project that strengthens our assets is certainly important to Michigan and will receive consideration for support as we further develop our vision. 

Bridge: A major rail expansion was just announced in Toledo -- $160 million for rail yard improvements that could lead to 275 jobs. Does this announcement make it more or less likely that proposals for SE Michigan will move forward?

A: One of Michigan’s assets is our connection to global infrastructure networks. We will make decisions on projects based on the capability to extend our connections to global markets or to make our system more efficient. Key to this will be ongoing efforts to form partnerships that can bring about a successful and efficient TDL system for Michigan.

Bridge: What are the principal hurdles to attracting more freight business through southeast Michigan?

A: The greatest hurdle currently is a lack of a clear, coherent and unified vision to leverage our TDL assets. In addition, we need to ensure an inter-connected TDL system that efficiently links to global connection points in order to increase freight volume and reduce costs.     

Bridge: The NITC project has drawn the lion's share of transport attention in Lansing in recent years. Why do you think the Michigan business community has not taken to the airwaves to counter the Moroun family's opposition to NITC?

A: We have overwhelmingly widespread support for the NITC from the business community, with all significant business stakeholders (except DIBC) backing the NITC. 

Bridge: Would MEDC favor the creation of a "super" transportation board to oversee the existing entities in southeast Michigan -- Detroit Airport Authority, Port of Detroit -- and focus efforts on a broader multimodal freight strategy? Why or why not?

A: For Michigan to become a global transportation, distribution and logistics hub, we will need to find ways to leverage our assets and develop an efficient system to move goods and people. The specifics of how to create the most efficient system have not been developed, but all options will be explored to ensure we are well-positioned for success.

Bridge: Can Michigan successfully pursue multiple freight hubs? MEDC has given support to the I-69 corridor effort -- is the Flint/Port Huron area a better fit for a freight hub than SE Michigan? Why or why not?

A: The I-69 corridor effort is one of four Next Michigan Development Corporations that have been approved by the state. The Next Michigan Development Corporations are important because they provide additional tools that are clustered around significant TDL assets in Michigan. The other three are in the Lansing region, Traverse City region and Detroit/Wayne County region.  

Bridge: If you could communicate only one idea about freight economics to Michigan taxpayers today, what would it be?

A: Michigan has an array of existing assets that can be leveraged to develop our state as a global transportation, distribution and logistics hub. This will lead to more jobs and greater investment in our state. The key will be to develop a unified vision and efficient TDL system that will connect our businesses to the global economy.

How impactful was this article for you?

Business Watch

Covering the intersection of business and policy, and informing Michigan employers and workers on the long road back from coronavirus.

Thanks to our Business Watch sponsors.

Support Bridge's nonprofit civic journalism. Donate today.

Only donate if we've informed you about important Michigan issues

See what new members are saying about why they donated to Bridge Michigan:

  • “In order for this information to be accurate and unbiased it must be underwritten by its readers, not by special interests.” - Larry S.
  • “Not many other media sources report on the topics Bridge does.” - Susan B.
  • “Your journalism is outstanding and rare these days.” - Mark S.

If you want to ensure the future of nonpartisan, nonprofit Michigan journalism, please become a member today. You, too, will be asked why you donated and maybe we'll feature your quote next time!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate Now