Skip to main content
Michigan’s nonpartisan, nonprofit news source

We need your vote!

During this important election year, Bridge readers like you know that high-quality journalism like ours is more critical than ever. There’s a lot on the line, and we’re working daily to deliver the information you need to prepare you for November’s election. Can we count on your vote of confidence in our newsroom? Donate today!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate

The cash-bond system has served the country since 1835. It’s finally time for a change.

The old adage is build a jail and the criminal justice system will fill it in less than a year. But who are those individuals filling the cells? It is mainly indigent defendants. The criminal justice system includes two tiers: One for those with money, who can afford to post a cash bond, and the other for those without.

Historically, jails are meant to house people who have committed low-level felonies, misdemeanors and for pretrial detainees. Most felonies to be served over one year are housed in the state corrections system.

Today, locations such as the Wayne County Jail house almost exclusively pretrial detainees. These detainees are primarily indigent, but still presumed innocent by our Constitution. Yet because of the cash bond mandate, they cannot raise the money and must stay behind bars until their trial. Those with money are quickly able to go home to their families.

Complicating the issue locally was the action by Gov. John Engler in the 1990’s, closing most of the state’s mental health facilities (including the Lafayette Clinic in Detroit). As a direct result, the Wayne County Jail has become the largest mental health facility in the state of Michigan.

The cash bond system has been the primary measure used by the courts since 1835, and is designed to assure that defendants return to court. There are nearly 500,000 people in the US awaiting trial, most of whom cannot afford a cash bond. A judge presiding over a cash bond hearing must decide whether the defendant is a flight risk and/or a risk to the community.

No doubt there are some violent and dangerous people who need to be in pretrial detention awaiting their trial. But The problem is the cash bond system is stacked against the indigent. How fair is it that a major drug dealer can make a cash bond for $100,000 and be out in the community before his/her trial date and yet a low offense detainee cannot make a $1,000 bond and must take up jail space until his/her trial date?

Many states and jurisdictions are starting to realize it is unfair, if not unconstitutional, for such a discrepancy to exist between those with money and without. The current system has indirectly created a debtors’ prison.

To correct this, some communities, courts and states have adopted data-driven formulas which are used to determine bond release eligibility. There are generally ten factors a judge will consider for a detainee release, ranging from whether the offense was violent to the defendant’s previous record and incarceration. This approach is being instituted in over 30 jurisdictions, including Chicago, Charlotte, Pittsburgh, Milwaukee, New Jersey and Houston.

Funding to study this approach is available from the Laura and John Arnold Foundation. It would behoove the criminal justice stakeholders not only in Wayne County but the state of Michigan to contact the foundation and investigate whether this data-driven approach could be successful in our communities.

A second option could be a constitutional challenge to cash bonds. Nine states are currently in litigation regarding their cash bond proceedings.

A Harvard study has implied that indigent defendants, are more likely plead guilty, lose their jobs, detach from their families and commit crimes in the future.

In Wayne County, the taxpayers pay $80 per day to house pretrial detainees who cannot afford low cash bonds.

No doubt jail space is critical in Wayne County. But as the county determines what is necessary for a new jail or criminal justice campus, the stakeholders should determine whether the jail bond bail system should be revised. It could have a profound effect on the size of the new jail at either location.

How impactful was this article for you?

Bridge welcomes guest columns from a diverse range of people on issues relating to Michigan and its future. The views and assertions of these writers do not necessarily reflect those of Bridge or The Center for Michigan. Bridge does not endorse any individual guest commentary submission. If you are interested in submitting a guest commentary, please contact David Zeman. Click here for details and submission guidelines.

Only donate if we've informed you about important Michigan issues

See what new members are saying about why they donated to Bridge Michigan:

  • “In order for this information to be accurate and unbiased it must be underwritten by its readers, not by special interests.” - Larry S.
  • “Not many other media sources report on the topics Bridge does.” - Susan B.
  • “Your journalism is outstanding and rare these days.” - Mark S.

If you want to ensure the future of nonpartisan, nonprofit Michigan journalism, please become a member today. You, too, will be asked why you donated and maybe we'll feature your quote next time!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate Now