Opinion | Michigan bills would bring clean energy to low-income families
Clean energy should not be treated like a privilege.
Michigan is making impressive strides toward building a clean energy future. Legislators have introduced proposals to cut pollution and grow the economy by investing in 100 percent, carbon-free electricity by 2035. These proposals deserve our full support because they also do something that utilities and policymakers traditionally neglected: help ensure that underserved, under-represented communities also enjoy the benefits of a clean energy future.
What does this mean?
It means that lower-income households and communities of color have access to solar energy resources.
Currently, utilities are allowed to cap the amount of customer-owned solar on the system and limit the compensation people receive for adding solar power to the grid, making it difficult for non-wealthy households to participate. As part of establishing an overall standard of 100 percent, carbon-free electricity for the state, the bills under consideration by the legislature (House bills 4759, 4760 and 4761 and Senate bills 271, 272 and 273) also include programs to increase access to renewable power for everyone.
For example, the legislation would require utilities to source sizable amounts of their renewable electricity from customer-owned rooftop solar and other smaller scale, distributed solar facilities that renters or other people without suitable roof space can subscribe to (known as “community solar”). Half or more of the projects in these categories would be reserved for low-income households, helping communities pursue their vision of locally owned, clean power that keeps more wealth circulating in their neighborhoods.
It means utilities must factor in the impact of their decisions and affordability of bills on underserved communities.
Under the proposed legislation, the Michigan Public Service Commission — the state entity that oversees Michigan’s utilities — would be explicitly directed to consider the energy challenges of today in reviewing utility plans for grid investments, rate adjustments and more. These important issues include public health, affordability and the effects of extreme weather fueled by climate change.
Empowering the commission to focus on those factors would, in turn, require utilities to act on them and provide plans that are healthier, safer and more equitable, especially when it comes to traditionally disadvantaged communities. As we receive increasingly detailed science about the intersection of our energy system with climate change, racial injustices and public health, it is time to update our expectations of what state regulators and the utilities must address.
It means bringing energy savings and energy efficiency programs to low-income households.
Known in Michigan as “energy waste reduction,” efficiency measures help lower utility bills because the cleanest and least expensive energy is the energy we don’t have to use. Efficiency programs can be paired with federal incentives to install better, lower-usage appliances and improve the comfort and indoor air quality of homes and businesses through improved weatherization.
One of the key legislative proposals under consideration would prioritize and require electric and gas utilities to focus efficiency programs on low-income communities, accounting for historical underinvestment and ensuring that program benefits flow to those who need them most.
Clean energy must no longer be treated like a privilege, available only to households and communities with ample resources. Multiple studies have shown that 100 percent, clean energy standards are achievable and present tremendous benefits for states like Michigan.
To make the clean energy transition we know is possible both fair and equitable, we need policies that increase access to solar power, hold utilities accountable to address pressing issues and focus energy efficiency investments toward those most in need.
Let’s ensure everyone benefits from our common pursuit of a healthy, carbon-free future.
See what new members are saying about why they donated to Bridge Michigan:
- “In order for this information to be accurate and unbiased it must be underwritten by its readers, not by special interests.” - Larry S.
- “Not many other media sources report on the topics Bridge does.” - Susan B.
- “Your journalism is outstanding and rare these days.” - Mark S.
If you want to ensure the future of nonpartisan, nonprofit Michigan journalism, please become a member today. You, too, will be asked why you donated and maybe we'll feature your quote next time!