Will personal property tax tug-of-war drag cities into the mud?
Legislation that would phase out Michigan's personal property tax -- essentially a business equipment levy -- on industrial and commercial property is working its way through the Michigan Senate. The repeal is strongly backed by business groups such as the Michigan Chamber of Commerce and manufacturers. It is just as strongly opposed by alliances of local governments and schools, who insist that any repeal of the tax must include a constitutional guarantee of replacement revenue to protect public services.
'Murky' bills take millions |
PPT is a roadblock
to Michigan businesses
trying to grow
By Lt. Gov. Brian Calley
After struggling through the last decade with a lagging economy, Michigan once again is becoming America’s success story.
One year ago, the state was cutting its way out of a $1.5 billion deficit. Today, Gov. Rick Snyder is proposing a fiscal year 2013 budget that strategically invests in key priorities such as education, public safety and transportation.
Just a few short years ago, Michigan was known for its high unemployment rate. Today, we’re seeing the lowest rate since August 2008.
While Michigan’s once-unfriendly business climate hampered job growth, today we’re seeing an increase in private-sector jobs, which climbed by 76,000 from February 2011 to February 2012.
This is no accident. We’re making tough decisions and enacting needed reforms that are creating an environment in which job providers can thrive.
But our work is not complete. Businesses still face too many barriers to expansion and job creation. One of those obstacles is the Personal Property Tax, or PPT.
The PPT is a tax on industrial, commercial and utility equipment that is paid by job providers. Incredibly, it penalizes job providers for their success. When a company expands or modernizes, it is punished with a tax on new equipment ranging from computers to already expensive tools and machinery. This is especially hard on manufacturers, who rely on costly equipment.
Considering that neighboring states such as Ohio and Illinois already have eliminated their versions of this outdated tax, Michigan can’t afford to be at such a competitive disadvantage.
To help grow our economy and put families back to work, an eight-bill package recently was introduced in the state Senate that phases out the PPT on eligible manufacturing personal property and exempts small parcels.
This proposal was fashioned in a thorough, deliberative manner and reflects months of discussion. It recognizes the heavy reliance that local governmental units have on the tax. Each classification of personal property generates about $400 million, or a total of $1.2 billion annually for local governmental units and the state. The proposal establishes a mechanism to protect local units as a portion of that total is phased out.
It should be noted that the PPT is burdensome to communities as well as businesses. The tax carries high administrative costs, as many municipal leaders point out. Easing this burden will reduce business compliance and local administrative costs by tens of millions of dollars.
Under the legislation:
• All “new” eligible manufacturing personal property is exempt beginning in 2016. This is all eligible manufacturing personal property that was placed into service on or after Jan. 1, 2012.
• The existing tax on eligible manufacturing personal property is phased out over seven years, beginning in 2016. By 2022, no manufacturing personal property will be subject to taxation.
• Beginning in 2013, all of a taxpayer’s industrial and commercial personal property within a local tax collecting unit is exempt, as long as the aggregate taxable value of that property is less than $40,000. This change alone will fully exempt the majority of commercial and industrial parcels.
• Eligible taxpayers will not have to file a PPT return. However, they will have to file an annual affidavit stating that the aggregate amount of industrial and commercial personal property does not equal or exceed $40,000 taxable value within a local tax collecting unit.
• Beginning in fiscal year 2016, the Department of Treasury will prepare an estimate for each category of political subdivision of revenue lost in that fiscal year as a result of the proposed exemptions. The estimate is based on reimbursing 100 percent of the debt mill loss and 100 percent of tax increment financing debt loss, as well as reimbursing locals for any remaining loss that exceeds 2 percent of their 2012 budget. The fund’s revenues will be derived from expiring certificated tax credits, which are credits to which the state already has committed. The fund will have enough revenue to hold at least 98 percent of each local unit’s budget harmless.
• Local governmental units will be responsible for developing distribution formulas for revenues earmarked for each political subdivision such as counties, cities, townships, authorities and school districts.
Michigan is on the move, but Lansing can’t stand still. Ridding employers of the antiquated, unfair PPT is the logical next step in Michigan’s march to prosperity.
See what new members are saying about why they donated to Bridge Michigan:
- “In order for this information to be accurate and unbiased it must be underwritten by its readers, not by special interests.” - Larry S.
- “Not many other media sources report on the topics Bridge does.” - Susan B.
- “Your journalism is outstanding and rare these days.” - Mark S.
If you want to ensure the future of nonpartisan, nonprofit Michigan journalism, please become a member today. You, too, will be asked why you donated and maybe we'll feature your quote next time!