Skip to main content
Michigan’s nonpartisan, nonprofit news source

We need your vote!

During this important election year, Bridge readers like you know that high-quality journalism like ours is more critical than ever. There’s a lot on the line, and we’re working daily to deliver the information you need to prepare you for November’s election. Can we count on your vote of confidence in our newsroom? Donate today!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate

Michigan communities consider installing solar panels on water

Solar panels in a pond
Cornell University's research ponds about being used to study any effects floating solar panels might have on the ecology. (Jason Koski/Courtesy: Cornell University)

Great Lakes News Collaborative

The Great Lakes region is blessed with an abundance of water. But water quality, affordability, and aging water infrastructure are vulnerabilities that have been ignored for far too long. In this series, members of the Great Lakes News Collaborative, Michigan Radio, Bridge Michigan, Great Lakes Now, and Circle of Blue, explore what it might take to preserve and protect this precious resource. This independent journalism is supported by the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation.

A couple of Michigan communities have considered a technology that’s just beginning to be used in the U.S.

Floating solar panels.

So far, no one has a Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy permit for putting solar panels on the water in Michigan, but there are plans.

Floating solar is basically solar panels on plastic rafts that are linked together and anchored to the bottom of a lake.

Ann Arbor and Pittsfield Township considered floating solar as part of the plan for a solar project they pursued. But that idea didn’t make it to the final version of the Wheeler Center Solar Park.

Plainfield Charter Township north of Grand Rapids has plans for a floating solar array, but it also has some obstacles.

Township Superintendent Cameron Van Wyngarden said these solar panels last twenty to thirty years.

“We were looking to save energy, you know, in excess of $1 million over that time frame. By offsetting a significant portion of our power usage at our water plant.”

Solar panels floating in a lake
A U.S. Department of Energy illustration of a floating solar installation. (U.S. Department Of Energy)

Why put solar on the water?

One of the reasons floating solar has been popular in other parts of the world is competition for land. Water offers another option for an installation.

    Van Wyngarden said there were good reasons for Plainfield Township to go with floating solar at the water plant.

    “We lacked other available space around it. But yet we had this open water area that made a lot of sense. It's adjacent to the plant. It was very convenient from a location perspective. A lot of open space. No worry about tree cover or other buildings, blocking sunlight. It made a lot of sense.” 

    Woman stands at a podium.
    U.S. Secretary of Interior, Deb Haaland, speaking at the University of Michigan. She mentioned floating solar in her comments. (Lester Graham/Michigan Public)

    Some states out west have embraced floating solar panels. U.S. Secretary of the Interior Deb Haaland mentioned it when she visited Michigan back in March.

    “One of the tribes decided that having a project of putting solar panels on their irrigation ditches was a way that they could keep water from evaporating so quickly while also powering the system.” 

    Related:

    That tribe was the Gila River Indian Community in Arizona. It calls its installation the country’s first solar-over-canal project. The power from the solar array floating on the canal is used to keep the irrigation pumps operating.

    What's the downside?

    A researcher in New York has been looking at what happens to a body of water when some or most of it is covered in plastic rafts topped with solar panels.

    Steve Grodsky works with the U.S. Geological Survey and Cornell University.

    Cornell has six research ponds of equal size. Grodsky put different sized installations on three of them. He left the other ponds alone so he could compare what happens to the ecology of those ponds.

    Man stands in front of solar installations.
    Steve Grodsky pointing out one of the floating solar installations at Cornell University's research ponds. He's an ecologist with the U.S. Geological Survey and Cornell University. (Lester Graham/Michigan Public)

    “You know, when you mess with light availability, water temperature that can in turn have effects on things like microbes, the mixing in the ponds. And there's sort of these bottom up effects that can manifest in terms of the plant community and aquatic insects,” Grodsky said. 

    On the other hand, solar panels floating on the water decrease harmful algal blooms and a reduce in evaporation.

    The research is not complete, but it could be that choosing a place where people like to fish or where there are critical aquatic organisms that make up the bottom of the food web might not be the best place to float a couple of acres or more of solar panels.

    But Grodsky said there are bodies of water where those concerns are not as pressing.

    Sponsor

    “You know, municipal ponds, wastewater treatment plants, there’s these kind of water bodies that I think makes sense to put them on in terms of marginalized ecological value and then using that space.”

    But, it cost more than installing on land

    That brings us back to Plainfield Township. It was all set for installing floating solar even though it’s more expensive than installations on the ground.

    The contractor for the project, White Pine Renewables, and the township have put a pause on installing floating solar units. What happened?

    Interest rates went up. Inflation went up.

    Cameron Van Wyngarden said it suddenly didn’t look financially feasible.

    Sponsor

    “Yeah, at this point we haven’t completely thrown away the idea of doing floating solar. But the numbers need to work out. And right now, either the financing costs need to come back in line or the material costs need to decrease to the point where, you know, one or the other makes sense again.”

    Plainfield Township is still hoping that happens because saving a million dollars over twenty years at the water plant could help keep water bills lower for their customers.

    How impactful was this article for you?

    Michigan Environment Watch

    Michigan Environment Watch examines how public policy, industry, and other factors interact with the state’s trove of natural resources.

    Michigan Environment Watch is made possible by generous financial support from:

    Our generous Environment Watch underwriters encourage Bridge Michigan readers to also support civic journalism by becoming Bridge members. Please consider joining today.

    Only donate if we've informed you about important Michigan issues

    See what new members are saying about why they donated to Bridge Michigan:

    • “In order for this information to be accurate and unbiased it must be underwritten by its readers, not by special interests.” - Larry S.
    • “Not many other media sources report on the topics Bridge does.” - Susan B.
    • “Your journalism is outstanding and rare these days.” - Mark S.

    If you want to ensure the future of nonpartisan, nonprofit Michigan journalism, please become a member today. You, too, will be asked why you donated and maybe we'll feature your quote next time!

    Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate Now