Skip to main content
Michigan’s nonpartisan, nonprofit news source

We need your vote!

During this important election year, Bridge readers like you know that high-quality journalism like ours is more critical than ever. There’s a lot on the line, and we’re working daily to deliver the information you need to prepare you for November’s election. Can we count on your vote of confidence in our newsroom? Donate today!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate

Uninsured watch anxiously as Medicaid debate rolls on

Greg Hunt does not consider himself a gambler.

But, in the back of his mind, the 25-year-old Kent County resident knows he is one health crisis removed from thousands of dollars in medical bills he can't pay.  Given that he has Addison's disease, a chronic endocrine disorder, an overactive thyroid gland and diabetes, it's more than an idle concern.

Hunt works up to 33 hours a week at $8.05 an hour at an area gas station. As a part-time employee, he does not qualify for health insurance. He makes just enough to pay rent, buy groceries and put gas in a car he borrows from his stepfather. He's also taking courses which he hopes lead to a nursing degree from Davenport University.

So, like many other twentysomethings, he forgoes health care insurance he cannot afford and hopes for the best.

“There's only so many things you can control,” he said.

There are thousands like Hunt in Michigan, their health care fate in the balance as legislators wrangle over Gov. Rick Snyder's proposal to expand Medicaid coverage. Snyder's plan to add an estimated 470,000 uninsured low-income individuals to Medicaid by 2021 stalled last month in the face of conservative resistance in the Republican Legislature.

This week, though, focus turned to a revised plan that cleared the House Michigan Competitiveness Committee on Wednesday. Under it, those earning between 100 percent and 133 percent of the federal poverty level could either purchase private insurance through the insurance health exchange authorized by the federal Affordable Care Act or pay up to 7 percent of income on out-of-pocket medical expenses under Medicaid coverage.

Advocates say failure to enact expansion would do more than undermine medical care for the uninsured, but also assure that Michigan hospitals will rack up more unpaid bills -- costs that are ultimately passed on through higher charges and escalating insurance premiums.

“The Medicaid expansion is a very smart way to go,” said Laura Appel, vice president of federal policy and advocacy for the Michigan Health and Hospital Association.

She noted that MHA figures show that in 2011 Michigan hospitals furnished nearly $1.9 billion in uncompensated care. Expanded Medicaid, while not a panacea, “will help alleviate that,” she said.

MORE COVERAGE: FAQs on Medicaid

Appel also argued that it also would lead to better health care, by promoting preventative medical practice and regular contact between patients and physicians and other health-care providers.

“You are ultimately going to have better outcomes,” she said.

Evidence for that, however, remains in dispute. A study released in May by the New England Journal of Medicine found mixed results in a comparison of a group of Oregon residents covered by Medicaid and a comparable group that was uninsured. It found that expanding Medicaid coverage “generated no significant improvements” in a variety of physical health outcomes. It did find a reduction in cases of depression and greater financial security among those on Medicaid.

Who will be affected by Medicaid expansion?

There are nearly 1.2 million uninsured residents in Michigan, according to a 2013 analysis by the Michigan Department of Community Health. Wayne County led with 277,663 residents, followed by Oakland County with 117,460, Macomb County with 96,541 and Kent County with 73,099.

Snyder frames expansion as a prudent reform to the health-care system that would save money for both the state and health care providers. He projected general fund savings of $206 million in 2014 and $1.2 billion in savings through 2020. The savings stem from patients who now receive mental health services paid by state general funds. These patients would be covered under Medicaid expansion.

MORE COVERAGE: Michigan gets high marks for private management of Medicaid

Under terms of the Affordable Care Act, the federal government is committed to pay full cost of Medicaid expansion from 2014 through 2016. Its share would fall to 90 percent by 2020 with states to pay no more than 10 percent after that.

Snyder proposes banking half of projected general fund savings to compensate for added state costs that accumulate after 2016. An analysis by the Senate Fiscal Agency projects that a “crossover point” - where costs exceed savings – will occur anywhere from fiscal year 2023 to FY2036.

Who’s on Medicaid now?

According to the state, Medicaid covered about 1.8 million residents, as of  April,  including nearly 1 million children, 287,298 disabled and 108,672 elderly.

Though more than half of total recipients, children accounted for just 25 percent of total cost as of fiscal 2012. Disabled adults accounted for 39 percent of cost, aged residents 19 percent and parents and caretaker adults 15 percent.

Medicaid’s total cost in Michigan in FY2012 was $12.9 billion, including $8.5 billion in federal funds and $2.4 billion in state general funds and general purpose funds, reports the Department of Community Health.

The expanded pool of Medicaid recipients would encompass low-income, able-bodied parents and adults who have no children and earn up to 133 percent of the federal poverty level. Medicaid now covers individuals  making up to $4,020 annually and families of four up to $8,713 annually.

Medicaid expansion was a key piece to health-care reform passed by Congress in 2010, projected to add 17 million U.S. residents to its health-care umbrella. But the U.S. Supreme Court in 2012, in upholding most of  the act, struck down its mandate to expand Medicaid. It left that decision to states.

Since then, about two dozen states have either rejected expansion or are leaning against it.

The costs of the uninsured

While he would welcome the health security expanded Medicaid could offer him, Grand Rapids resident Hunt said he hopes to have coverage of his own within four years.

“Maybe you will have a better job,” he said.

But until then, he is at the mercy of events beyond his control. He recalled his hospitalization in December at Metro Health Hospital in suburban Grand Rapids for a diabetic attack.

“It ran me $12,000. They wrote off that bill,” he said.

Hunt said he owes about $515 on another hospital bill that he is still paying off. He has a prescription to regulate his thyroid gland that he can't afford to fill.

“It costs $100 a month. I can't afford it so I don't get that one,” he said.

A Grand Rapids physician who treats both the uninsured and those on Medicaid said choices like that, forced by lack of coverage, can be costly.

“A patient I can think of ended up having a stroke,” recalled Thomas Platt, chief medical officer for Cherry Street Health Services, a West Michigan nonprofit offering comprehensive health services to low-income children and families.

“Had that patient been able to get in for the right medication and services, that was a totally preventable situation. There was a very good chance that stroke never would have happened. It's a big issue. Patients say, 'Do I get food, do I pay my rent or do I pay for my medication?'”

Platt cited another patient with a painful foot condition whose lack of coverage jeopardizes both her health and job:

“She has plantar fasciitis and no medical coverage. The surgery to correct this is about $4,500. I am afraid she is going to lose her job because she is walking on a hard surface all day. There is simply no other way of getting that corrected.”

Grand Rapids residents Aurelio and Maria Salto make about $26,000 a year in joint income, from his work as a carpet installer and her home business selling kitchen ware. With a daughter, Elizabeth, 18, they are near the income cutoff for expanded Medicaid. The Saltos say they cannot afford health insurance.

And with virtually no savings, the Saltos think twice before seeing a doctor. They are still paying off part of a $2,400 medical bill Maria, 53, incurred from a lifting accident at an earlier job in a factory. Aurelio, 44, recalled that he underwent a recent physical exam and was told to get follow-up blood and other tests. He deferred.

Speaking in Spanish, with his wife translating, Aurelio said, “I didn't go because I knew it would be a bigger bill.”

Ted Roelofs worked for the Grand Rapids Press for 30 years, where he covered everything from politics to social services to military affairs. He has earned numerous awards, including for work in Albania during the 1999 Kosovo refugee crisis.

How impactful was this article for you?

Only donate if we've informed you about important Michigan issues

See what new members are saying about why they donated to Bridge Michigan:

  • “In order for this information to be accurate and unbiased it must be underwritten by its readers, not by special interests.” - Larry S.
  • “Not many other media sources report on the topics Bridge does.” - Susan B.
  • “Your journalism is outstanding and rare these days.” - Mark S.

If you want to ensure the future of nonpartisan, nonprofit Michigan journalism, please become a member today. You, too, will be asked why you donated and maybe we'll feature your quote next time!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate Now