Skip to main content
Michigan’s nonpartisan, nonprofit news source

Your support can help us meet our year-end campaign goal!

We’re in the homestretch of our year-end fundraising campaign, and we’re so close to our goal. Your support of any amount means so much to us, and helps us inform Michigan’s residents and communities. Will you support the nonprofit, nonpartisan news that makes Michigan a better place? Make your tax-deductible contribution today!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate

Truth Squad: Bill Schuette is falsely blamed for ignoring PFAS victims

New Truth Squad rating categories

Truth Squad has reduced the number of rating categories to the following:

  • FAIR: The ad or statement is generally accurate and fairly and credibly presents the speaker’s position on the issue at hand.     
  • MISLEADING: While individual parts of the ad or statement may be accurate, it reaches a conclusion or leaves an impression about an issue or candidate that is misleading in important respects
  • FOUL: The ad or statement contains one or more material factual errors

Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette is coming under fire from a Super PAC on claims he’s too focused on running for his Republican campaign for governor to protect residents of Kent County from hazardous chemicals in their water.

Truth Squad rates the claims from Southfield-based For Our Future Michigan foul, because it takes a legitimate issue –  PFAS contamination in Michigan waters – and scurrilously blames Schuette.

THE CLAIMS

The digital ad was released in August and features a couple from the Plainfield area of Kent County discussing their community’s exposure to PFAS chemicals that leached into the water from Wolverine Worldwide, a Rockford-based footwear company.

A woman in the ad says she has health issues, including a hysterectomy, while text in the ad says Schuette should be the “last line of defense” but is “nowhere to be found.”

“Our attorney general for the state is too busy running for governor and hiding from Flint,” the woman’s husband says in the ad.

CONCLUSION

PFAS contamination — in Kent County and statewide — is a serious issue, and it has prompted debate about whether Michigan could have acted more quickly and aggressively to address it.

But the Attorney General’s Office isn’t the first line of government oversight on environmental remediation, and the ad doesn’t support its claim that once the PFAS dangers became apparent that Schuette dropped the ball.

The ad omits the fact that Schuette’s office sued Wolverine Worldwide in January, in an effort to hold the company accountable for contamination and cleanup costs.

Related: Bill Schuette no longer touts Trump ties, but president’s shadow follows

In a press statement accompanying the ad, the group hit Schuette for not following up on Gov. Rick Snyder’s mid-July request to sue 3M, the Minnesota-based chemical giant that manufactured many of the PFAS-laced products that may be responsible for some contamination of the state’s waters. (In defending itself, Wolverine Worldwide says 3M bears some responsibility for manufacturing hazardous chemicals used in the shoes.)

By law, the attorney general must sue on behalf of the state any time the governor asks, according to Snyder’s office. Anna Heaton, a Snyder spokeswoman, said Schuette’s office is preparing the lawsuit but has yet to file it.

Josh Pugh, a spokesman for For Our Future Michigan, downplayed the significance of the lawsuit Schuette filed against Wolverine, calling it “yet another example of the attorney general being the last one willing to do anything to hold polluters accountable.”

Pugh instead credited the action against Wolverine to “two attorneys in his office who are statutorily required” to file the suit.

The argument ignores how environmental law works — as well as the suit’s timing, which came one day after the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality established a legal threshold for requiring cleanups of PFAS. Taking Wolverine to court without that cleanup criteria would make little sense.

Another key accusation in the ad is downright bizarre: That Schuette is “running from Flint.”

No doubt, Schuette’s handling of the Flint water crisis has prompted criticism –  that he’s been too aggressive and overly political in prosecuting top state officials for the tragedy.

Schuette has dismissed the criticisms, saying he’s “doing my job” in seeking justice for a “serious matter” that may have caused a dozen deaths from Legionnaires disease.

Pugh questioned why Schuette didn’t prosecute former DEQ director Dan Wyant.

Still, the suggestion that Schuette is “running from Flint” makes little sense.

Some Truth Squad calls are difficult. This isn’t one of them. For Our Future presents no evidence Schuette is responsible for PFAS or “nowhere to be found” for victims. The claims rate a call of foul.

 

How impactful was this article for you?

Only donate if we've informed you about important Michigan issues

See what new members are saying about why they donated to Bridge Michigan:

  • “In order for this information to be accurate and unbiased it must be underwritten by its readers, not by special interests.” - Larry S.
  • “Not many other media sources report on the topics Bridge does.” - Susan B.
  • “Your journalism is outstanding and rare these days.” - Mark S.

If you want to ensure the future of nonpartisan, nonprofit Michigan journalism, please become a member today. You, too, will be asked why you donated and maybe we'll feature your quote next time!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate Now